They should include even more advanced filtering like uBlock and uMatrix and remove the rule number limit, but even if they do that in the next API version I am sure they won't remove the companion app requirement which to me, makes sense because it brings extensions on the same level of visibility and responsibility as the rest of the software.The first thing you will notice when you set up 1Blocker X on an iOS device is its 7 toggles in Safari’s Content Blocker section of the Settings app.
On the other hand, Apple is wrong when it comes to content blockers.
#1blocker legacy install#
Apple doesn't want to deal with that, extension must pass review just like any other app you are letting on your system because at the end of the day we are granting it full access to everything you do in your browser - that's a huge amount of trust that we place in a third party developer every time we install an extension. xpi into your Firefox from anywhere as long as it is signed, Mozilla is struggling to keep people safe from malicious extensions because of this side-loading ability.
That's the way forward and Apple is not going to change their mind on their API nor they will give up on requiring extensions to get installed along with an app through the store only. Īll new Safari extensions require application to be installed at all. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. You are receiving this because you were mentioned. I wonder if this is going to be the standard for safari 13 and onwards. They indeed run as seperate application in the background. Its a "thing" with all these adblockers that support safari 13. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub ?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABG2XK6BKYWGBPQAH7AMKULP55XEJA5CNFSM4HZIFS2KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZJ4FYQ#issuecomment-508805858>, or mute the thread. You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Free, open-source, many lists, element blocker.
On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:11 PM, translit wrote: AdGuard.
#1blocker legacy mac#
Requires a Mac application running in the background. On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Jeroen wrote:Įxtremely slow and sluggish. Hopefully someone else will pick up the mantle soon and do what's needed to make it compatible with Safari again. It would be fair if came out of retirement long enough to at least publicly declare its fate. What I wanted to point out is that other people might not know, not care enough, or just need some alternative (however bad it is still better than having no ad blocker at all) which uBlock LLC is currently providing and this project is not.įrom what I see on the issue tracker this projecct seems to be dead for at least a year. I am using uBlock Origin long enough on all platforms to know the difference between it and the uBlock LLC. To me that looks like a way forward, since that seems how uBlock LLC and others are working around the Content Blocker extension limits. However, they now also offer Safari App Extensions and they even offer a Legacy Extension to Safari App Extension conversion guide. I have known since Mojave Beta that Apple wants to kill old type of powerful extensions in favor of much more limited content blockers. In any case there is no need to be rude and call people who know less than you idiots.
#1blocker legacy free#
If someone relevant finds my comments unproductive they are free to delete them and you are free to ignore them.
0 kommentar(er)
